Premium
Evolving treatment strategies in thin cutaneous head and neck melanoma: 1 institution's experience
Author(s) -
Jaber James J.,
Clark Joseph I.,
Muzaffar Kamil,
Ruggiero Francis P.,
Feustel Paul J.,
Frett Michael J.,
Zender Chad A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.21403
Subject(s) - medicine , biopsy , sentinel lymph node , melanoma , head and neck , breslow thickness , head and neck cancer , incidence (geometry) , sentinel node , population , dermatology , surgery , cancer , radiology , radiation therapy , breast cancer , physics , cancer research , optics , environmental health
Background Although existing melanoma literature provides recommendations for thinner lesions (≤1 mm) within a heterogeneous population, a focus on the head and neck group is less pervasive. Methods The records of 49 node‐negative individuals with thin head and neck melanoma that underwent surgical intervention ± sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy were reviewed. Results A significant increased Breslow thickness and mitotic rate, and a trend toward significance in Clark level ≥ IV were shown in patients that underwent an SLN biopsy versus those that did not. The total number of positive biopsies was 2 (5%). In our subset analysis using the modified American Joint Committee on Cancer recommendations by Wong and colleagues, the incidence of positive SLN biopsy would have increased to 11%. Conclusion We advocate performing an SLN biopsy in thin head and neck melanomas for primary tumors > 0.75 mm, regardless of “high‐risk” features as described by Wong and colleagues. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2011
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom