Premium
Enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Hutcheson Katherine A.,
Lewin Jan S.,
Sturgis Erich M.,
Kapadia Asha,
Risser Jan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.21399
Subject(s) - laryngectomy , medicine , meta analysis , surgery , larynx
Background Enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is a challenging complication after laryngectomy with TEP. We sought to estimate the rate of enlarged puncture, associated pneumonia rates, potential risk factors, and conservative treatments excluding complete surgical TEP closure. Methods A systematic review was conducted (1978–2008). A summary risk estimate was calculated using a random‐effects meta‐analysis model. Results Twenty‐seven peer‐reviewed manuscripts were included. The rate of enlarged puncture and/or leakage around the prosthesis was reported in 23 articles (range, 1% to 29%; summary risk estimate, 7.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8% to 9.6%). Temporary removal of the prosthesis and TEP‐site injections were the most commonly reported conservative treatments. Prosthetic diameter ( p = .076) and timing of TEP ( p = .297) were analyzed as risk factors; however, radiotherapy variables were inconsistently reported. Conclusion The overall risk of enlarged puncture seems relatively low, but it remains a rehabilitative challenge. Future research should clearly establish risk factors for enlarged puncture and optimal conservative management. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2011
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom