z-logo
Premium
Usefulness of 201 TL SPECT/CT relative to 18 F‐FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent skull base nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Author(s) -
Yen RuohFang,
Ting LaiLei,
Cheng MeiFang,
Wu YenWen,
Tzen KaiYuan,
Hong RueyLong
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.21026
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , medicine , lesion , nasopharyngeal carcinoma , positron emission tomography , single photon emission computed tomography , radiology , radiation therapy , pathology
Background This study was designed to compare 201 Tl single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT with 18‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose ( 18 F‐FDG) PET/CT in diagnosing recurrent skull base nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods Twenty‐seven patients were recruited. Both 201 Tl SPECT/CT and 18 F‐FDG PET/CT for each patient were performed at least 4 months later after initial therapy. Results The sensitivity and specificity for 201 Tl SPECT/CT were 66.7% and 100%, and those for 18 F‐FDG PET/CT were 86.7% and 75.0%. Lesion/background ratios were obtained for the 10 lesions that were both SPECT and PET true positive. For the 8 patients with recurrences in nasopharyngeal regions, PET lesion/background ratios were all higher than SPECT lesion/background ratios. For the 2 patients with intracranial metastases, SPECT lesion/background ratios were higher than PET lesion/background ratios. Conclusion 201 Tl SPECT/CT is as effective as 18 F‐FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent NPC. For intracranial recurrence, 201 Tl SPECT, because of its high intracranial lesion/background ratio, is probably better than 18 F‐FDG PET. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom