Premium
Lateral oromandibular defect: When is it appropriate to use a bridging reconstruction plate combined with a soft tissue revascularized flap?
Author(s) -
Chepeha Douglas B.,
Teknos Theodoros N.,
Fung Kevin,
Shargorodsky Josef,
Sacco Assuntina G.,
Nussenbaum Brian,
Jones Lamont,
Eisbruch Avraham,
Bradford Carol R.,
Prince Mark E.,
Moyer Jeffrey S.,
Lee Julia S.,
Wolf Gregory T.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/hed.20776
Subject(s) - medicine , soft tissue , bridging (networking) , surgery , significant difference , dentistry , computer network , computer science
Background A quasi‐experimental retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate a new concept of free tissue volume restoration combined with bridging reconstruction plate (compartment approach) to reduce plate‐related complication rates. Methods We evaluated 40 patients with large lateral mandible defects and associated complex soft tissue defects reconstructed with a revascularized soft tissue flap and titanium hollow screw reconstruction plates. A case‐control comparison was performed based on reconstruction type: restoration of soft tissue defect (conventional approach—group 1) versus over‐reconstruction of soft tissue defect (compartment approach—group 2). Results Plate exposure rate was 6 of 16 (38%) in group 1 versus 2 of 24 (8%) in group 2, and the difference was statistically significant ( p = .04). The mean time to exposure was 10 months. Plate fracture rate was 6 of 23 (26.1%) in dentulous patients versus 1 of 17 (5.9%) in edentulous patients. Gastrostomy tube dependence was 6 of 16 (38%) in group 1 versus 6 of 24 (25%) in group 2. Conclusion The “compartment approach” reduces plate exposure rate and gastrostomy tube dependence. Revascularized osseocutaneous reconstruction is still required in dentulous patients. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008