Premium
On approximations in treatment costing
Author(s) -
Whynes David K.,
Walker Andrew R.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
health economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.55
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1099-1050
pISSN - 1057-9230
DOI - 10.1002/hec.4730040104
Subject(s) - activity based costing , context (archaeology) , ex ante , economics , cost estimate , econometrics , operations management , actuarial science , computer science , operations research , accounting , mathematics , geography , archaeology , management , macroeconomics
As detailed costing may be a time‐consuming and expensive exercise within an evaluation, economists will be conscious of the possibilities of taking short‐cuts. To explore the viability of such approaches in the context of acute care (the surgical treatment for colorectal cancer), we compare the results of a detailed costing study with reduced list costing and econometric estimation. We conclude, first, that use of a reduced list is likely to generate substantial research economies only at the expense of inaccuracy. Second, crude costing, based upon average costs of the specialty, is acceptable when the frame of reference is the aggregate. Such crude costing, however, is vulnerable to bias when specific sub‐samples of patients are to be considered. Finally, total costs are predictable from a restricted list of cost and event variables, and with a high degree of accuracy, although ex ante specification of the functional form is problematic.