Premium
When full insurance may not be optimal: The case of restricted substitution
Author(s) -
Jaspersen Johannes G.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
health economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.55
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1099-1050
pISSN - 1057-9230
DOI - 10.1002/hec.4491
Subject(s) - actuarial science , purchasing , health insurance , context (archaeology) , economics , group insurance , subsidy , health care , population , insurance policy , general insurance , income protection insurance , medicine , market economy , paleontology , operations management , environmental health , biology , economic growth
Even when heavily subsidized, a substantial portion of people choose to forgo purchasing health insurance coverage. In this note, I introduce an explanation for this phenomenon which does not assume choice errors, incorrect beliefs, differently priced uncompensated care, or information asymmetries. When individuals are incapable of freely trading off health and wealth and the initial allocation of goods is suboptimal from their perspective, the standard result of demand for actuarially fair insurance in a single good world does not generalize to the health insurance context. Thus, people might not purchase full health insurance coverage even if it is priced at actuarially fair levels. I argue that this situation is particularly likely to occur in the low‐income population, and hence it is relevant for the achievement of universal health coverage.