z-logo
Premium
Individual survival curves comparing subjective and observed mortality risks
Author(s) -
Bissonnette Luc,
Hurd Michael D.,
Michaud PierreCarl
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
health economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.55
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1099-1050
pISSN - 1057-9230
DOI - 10.1002/hec.3506
Subject(s) - life expectancy , welfare , consumption (sociology) , survival analysis , actuarial science , economics , proportional hazards model , econometrics , demography , health and retirement study , statistics , medicine , gerontology , population , mathematics , social science , sociology , market economy
Summary We compare individual survival curves constructed from objective (actual mortality) and elicited subjective information (probability of survival to a given target age). We develop a methodology to estimate jointly subjective and objective individual survival curves accounting for rounding on subjective reports of perceived survival. We make use of the long follow‐up period in the Health and Retirement Study and the high quality of mortality data to estimate individual survival curves that feature both observed and unobserved heterogeneity. This allows us to compare objective and subjective estimates of remaining life expectancy for various groups and compare welfare effects of objective and subjective mortality risk using the life cycle model of consumption. We find that subjective and objective hazards are not the same. The median welfare loss from misperceptions of mortality risk when annuities are not available is 7% of current wealth at age 65 whereas more than 25% of respondents have losses larger than 60% of wealth. When annuities are available and exogenously given, the welfare loss is substantially lower.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here