Premium
Behind‐the‐Counter, but Over‐the‐Border? The Assessment of the Geographical Spillover Effects of Emergency Contraception on Abortions
Author(s) -
Cintina Inna
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
health economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.55
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1099-1050
pISSN - 1057-9230
DOI - 10.1002/hec.3394
Subject(s) - medical prescription , emergency contraception , spillover effect , pharmacy , abortion , hotline , demography , demographic economics , medicine , business , fertility , population , geography , family planning , family medicine , environmental health , economics , pregnancy , research methodology , computer science , nursing , telecommunications , sociology , biology , genetics , microeconomics
Washington was the first state to ease the prescription requirements making emergency contraception (EC) available behind‐the‐counter at pharmacies to women of any age in 1998. Using county‐level vital statistics data in conjunction with the pharmacy specific location data from the Not‐2‐Late Hotline database, I study whether the increased access to EC affects fertility rates within the state and beyond the borders of the state that allows it. Unlike other studies that rely on geographic variations in access, I show that increased availability of EC in Washington, measured by the distance to the closest ‘no‐prescription EC pharmacy’, is associated with a statistically significant albeit economically moderate decrease in abortion rates in Washington counties where women had access to ‘no‐prescription EC’. These effects are localized (i.e., decrease with travel distance) and robust in a number of specifications. Finally, I find some evidence in support of geographical spillover effects in Idaho, but not in Oregon. However, after accounting for the availability of abortion services, the decrease in ‘treated’ Idaho counties is rather small. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.