Open AccessCover Image
Author(s) -
Bowling Jake T.,
Friston Karl J.,
Hopfinger Joseph B.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Reports
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.24647
Subject(s) - neuroscience , psychology , cover (algebra) , cognitive psychology , computer science , mechanical engineering , engineering
COVER ILLUSTRATION Left: Results from random effects analysis (p < .05 FWE) for all experimental conditions (exogenous attention, endogenous attention, and antipredictive cueing). Right: Schematic of dynamic causal modeling (DCM) model space, showing the four regions of interest (L & R Frontal Eye Fields (FEF) and Intraparietal Sulci (IPS)), intrinsic connections, and modulatory inputs. Our DCM analysis focused on how each condition (indicated by the blue, purple, and red arrows) modulated FEF ‐> IPS and IPS ‐> FEF connectivity. Image adapted from from our Figure 2 (Bowling, Friston, & Hopfinger, 2020, Top‐down versus bottom‐up attention differentially modulate frontal‐parietal connectivity, Human Brain Mapping, 41 (4)) and generated using Prisma Photo Editor (Prisma labs, inc.).