z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Low frequency steady‐state brain responses modulate large scale functional networks in a frequency‐specific means
Author(s) -
Wang YiFeng,
Long Zhiliang,
Cui Qian,
Liu Feng,
Jing XiuJuan,
Chen Heng,
Guo XiaoNan,
Yan Jin H.,
Chen HuaFu
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.23037
Subject(s) - resting state fmri , neuroscience , frequency modulation , low frequency , brain activity and meditation , time–frequency analysis , computer science , scale (ratio) , radio spectrum , electroencephalography , psychology , physics , telecommunications , radio frequency , radar , quantum mechanics
Neural oscillations are essential for brain functions. Research has suggested that the frequency of neural oscillations is lower for more integrative and remote communications. In this vein, some resting‐state studies have suggested that large scale networks function in the very low frequency range (<1 Hz). However, it is difficult to determine the frequency characteristics of brain networks because both resting‐state studies and conventional frequency tagging approaches cannot simultaneously capture multiple large scale networks in controllable cognitive activities. In this preliminary study, we aimed to examine whether large scale networks can be modulated by task‐induced low frequency steady‐state brain responses (lfSSBRs) in a frequency‐specific pattern. In a revised attention network test, the lfSSBRs were evoked in the triple network system and sensory‐motor system, indicating that large scale networks can be modulated in a frequency tagging way. Furthermore, the inter‐ and intranetwork synchronizations as well as coherence were increased at the fundamental frequency and the first harmonic rather than at other frequency bands, indicating a frequency‐specific modulation of information communication. However, there was no difference among attention conditions, indicating that lfSSBRs modulate the general attention state much stronger than distinguishing attention conditions. This study provides insights into the advantage and mechanism of lfSSBRs. More importantly, it paves a new way to investigate frequency‐specific large scale brain activities. Hum Brain Mapp 37:381–394, 2016 . © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here