Open AccessThe neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture
Author(s) -
Kaas Amanda L.,
van Mier Hanneke,
Visser Maya,
Goebel Rainer
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.21500
Subject(s) - central sulcus , psychology , neuroscience , working memory , sensory system , neural substrate , somatosensory system , functional magnetic resonance imaging , intraparietal sulcus , superior parietal lobule , cognition , dorsolateral prefrontal cortex , encoding (memory) , prefrontal cortex , motor cortex , stimulation
Fine surface texture is best discriminated by touch, in contrast to macro geometric features like shape. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a delayed match‐to‐sample task to investigate the neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture. Blindfolded right‐handed males encoded the texture or location of up to four sandpaper stimuli using the dominant or non‐dominant hand. They maintained the information for 10–12 s and then answered whether a probe stimulus matched the memory array. Analyses of variance with the factors Hand, Task, and Load were performed on the estimated percent signal change for the encoding and delay phase. During encoding, contralateral effects of Hand were found in sensorimotor regions, whereas Load effects were observed in bilateral postcentral sulcus (BA2), secondary somatosensory cortex (S2), pre‐SMA, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and superior parietal lobule (SPL). During encoding and delay, Task effects (texture > location) were found in central sulcus, S2, pre‐SMA, dlPFC, and SPL. The Task and Load effects found in hand‐ and modality‐specific regions BA2 and S2 indicate involvement of these regions in the tactile encoding and maintenance of fine surface textures. Similar effects in hand‐ and modality‐unspecific areas dlPFC, pre‐SMA and SPL suggest that these regions contribute to the cognitive monitoring required to encode and maintain multiple items. Our findings stress both the particular importance of S2 for the encoding and maintenance of tactile surface texture, as well as the supramodal nature of parieto‐frontal networks involved in cognitive control. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.