z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dissociable neural imprints of perception and grammar in auditory functional imaging
Author(s) -
Herrmann Björn,
Obleser Jonas,
Kalberlah Christian,
Haynes JohnDylan,
Friederici Angela D.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.21235
Subject(s) - grammaticality , sensory system , psychology , functional magnetic resonance imaging , perception , cognition , cognitive psychology , syntax , speech perception , temporal cortex , grammar , neuroscience , computer science , linguistics , artificial intelligence , philosophy
In language processing, the relative contribution of early sensory and higher cognitive brain areas is still an open issue. A recent controversial hypothesis proposes that sensory cortices show sensitivity to syntactic processes, whereas other studies suggest a wider neural network outside sensory regions. The goal of the current event‐related fMRI study is to clarify the contribution of sensory cortices in auditory syntactic processing in a 2 × 2 design. Two‐word utterances were presented auditorily and varied both in perceptual markedness (presence or absence of an overt word category marking “‐t”), and in grammaticality (syntactically correct or incorrect). A multivariate pattern classification approach was applied to the data, flanked by conventional cognitive subtraction analyses. The combination of methods and the 2 × 2 design revealed a clear picture: The cognitive subtraction analysis found initial syntactic processing signatures in a neural network including the left IFG, the left aSTG, the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), as well as the right STS/STG. Classification of local multivariate patterns indicated the left‐hemispheric regions in IFG, aSTG, and STS to be more syntax‐specific than the right‐hemispheric regions. Importantly, auditory sensory cortices were only sensitive to the overt perceptual marking, but not to the grammaticality, speaking against syntax‐inflicted sensory cortex modulations. Instead, our data provide clear evidence for a distinction between regions involved in pure perceptual processes and regions involved in initial syntactic processes. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here