Open AccessLocation and spatial profile of category‐specific regions in human extrastriate cortex
Author(s) -
Spiridon Mona,
Fischl Bruce,
Kanwisher Nancy
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/hbm.20169
Subject(s) - extrastriate cortex , neuroscience , cortex (anatomy) , psychology , temporal cortex , visual cortex , brain mapping , occipital lobe , hum , surprise , cartography , communication , geography , art , performance art , art history
Subjects were scanned in a single functional MRI (fMRI) experiment that enabled us to localize cortical regions in each subject in the occipital and temporal lobes that responded significantly in a variety of contrasts: faces > objects, body parts > objects, scenes > objects, objects > scrambled objects, and moving > stationary stimuli. The resulting activation maps were coregistered across subjects using spherical surface coordinates [Fischl et al., Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:272–284] to produce a “percentage overlap map” indicating the percentage of subjects who showed a significant response for each contrast at each point on the surface. Prominent among the overlapping activations in these contrasts were the fusiform face area (FFA), extrastriate body area (EBA), parahippocampal place area (PPA), lateral occipital complex (LOC), and MT+/V5; only a few other areas responded consistently across subjects in these contrasts. Another analysis showed that the spatial profile of the selective response drops off quite sharply outside the standard borders of the FFA and PPA (less so for the EBA and MT+/V5), indicating that these regions are not simply peaks of very broad selectivities spanning centimeters of cortex, but fairly discrete regions of cortex with distinctive functional profiles. The data also yielded a surprise that challenges our understanding of the function of area MT+: a higher response to body parts than to objects. The anatomical consistency of each of our functionally defined regions across subjects and the spatial sharpness of their activation profiles within subjects highlight the fact that these regions constitute replicable and distinctive landmarks in the functional organization of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.