Premium
International Health Research after Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner
Author(s) -
Rothstein Mark A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
hastings center report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-146X
pISSN - 0093-0334
DOI - 10.1002/hast.539
Subject(s) - european union , united states national security agency , data protection act 1998 , political science , law , agency (philosophy) , data protection directive , economic justice , government (linguistics) , certification , personal jurisdiction , public administration , business , jurisdiction , national security , european union law , sociology , international trade , social science , linguistics , philosophy
On October 6, 2015, in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner, the European Court of Justice, the European Union's highest court, held that the fifteen‐year‐old Safe Harbor Framework Agreement with the United States was invalid. Under the agreement, about forty‐five hundred American companies each year self‐certified to the U.S. Department of Commerce that they were in compliance with the essential privacy protections of the European Union, and therefore it was permissible for entities in the European Union to send personal data to these American companies. According to the court, because some American companies were making the personal data of E.U. citizens available to U.S. government agencies, such as the National Security Agency (NSA), the fundamental privacy interests of E.U. citizens were not being protected. As a result of this court decision there has been considerable speculation about what, if any, effect the case has on international collaboration in health research, in particular, the sharing of personal data by E.U. researchers with their U.S. colleagues.