Premium
Life‐Years & Rationing in the Covid‐19 Pandemic: A Critical Analysis
Author(s) -
Gaurke MaryKatherine,
Prusak Bernard,
Jeong Kyeong Yun,
Scire Emily,
Sulmasy Daniel P.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
hastings center report
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.515
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1552-146X
pISSN - 0093-0334
DOI - 10.1002/hast.1283
Subject(s) - covid-19 , pandemic , rationing , betacoronavirus , virology , economics , medicine , economic growth , outbreak , health care , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Prominent bioethicists have promoted the preservation of life‐years as a rationing strategy in response to the Covid‐19 pandemic. Yet the philosophical justification for maximizing life‐years is underdeveloped and has a complex history that is not reflected in recent literature. In this article, we offer a critical investigation of the use of life‐years, arguing that evidence of public support for the life‐years approach is thin and that organ transplantation protocols (heavily cited in pandemic‐response protocols) do not provide a precedent for seeking to save the most life‐years. We point out that many state emergency‐response plans ultimately rejected or severely attenuated the meaning of saving the most life‐years, and we argue that philosophical arguments in support of rationing by life‐years are remarkably wanting. We conclude by offering a fair alternative that adheres to the standard duties of beneficence, respect for persons, and justice .