Premium
Are Scores on H ofstede's Dimensions of National Culture Stable over Time? A Cohort Analysis
Author(s) -
Beugelsdijk Sjoerd,
Maseland Robbert,
Hoorn André
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
global strategy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.814
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 2042-5805
pISSN - 2042-5791
DOI - 10.1002/gsj.1098
Subject(s) - hofstede's cultural dimensions theory , uncertainty avoidance , individualism , world values survey , social psychology , cultural diversity , indulgence , sociology , survey data collection , meaning (existential) , psychology , economic geography , collectivism , political science , economics , statistics , mathematics , anthropology , law , psychotherapist
H ofstede's framework, which is based on survey data collected in the late 1960s and early 1970s, dominates quantitative culture research in international strategic management. However, as countries develop economically, modernization theory predicts shifts in cultural values, which likely affect countries' scores on H ofstede's work‐related values dimensions, in turn raising doubt about the continued relevance of this framework for global strategy researchers and practitioners. We examine how country scores on H ofstede's dimensions have developed over time by replicating H ofstede's dimensions for two birth cohorts using data from the World Values Survey. Results indicate that, on average, contemporary societies score higher on Individualism and Indulgence versus Restraint, and they score lower on Power Distance than do past societies. We find that cultural change is absolute rather than relative, meaning that countries' scores on the H ofstede dimensions relative to the scores of other countries have not changed very much. As a consequence, cultural differences between country pairs (i.e., cultural distances) are generally stable. We discuss the implications of our findings for global strategy research.