z-logo
Premium
Lithium augmentation in geriatric depressed outpatients: A clinical report
Author(s) -
Parker Karen L.,
Mitmann Nicole,
Shear Neil H.,
Herrmann Nathan,
Shulman Kenneth I.,
Silver Ivan L.,
Gardner David M.,
Busto Usoa E.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
international journal of geriatric psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.28
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1099-1166
pISSN - 0885-6230
DOI - 10.1002/gps.930091209
Subject(s) - nortriptyline , depression (economics) , antidepressant , lithium (medication) , medicine , adverse effect , geriatric depression scale , doxepin , rating scale , global assessment of functioning , phenelzine , psychiatry , psychology , amitriptyline , anesthesia , depressive symptoms , cognition , developmental psychology , biochemistry , enzyme , chemistry , monoamine oxidase , hippocampus , economics , macroeconomics , body mass index
Lithium augmentation of antidepressant therapy in elderly outpatients has not been systematically assessed. A prospective, practice‐based observational study of 44 patients comparing an antidepressant monotherapy group ( N = 23) with a lithium augmentation group ( N = 21) was conducted in a geriatric psychiatry, outpatient clinic. The severity of depression was evaluated with the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the DSM‐III‐R Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), a treatment effectiveness rating (ER) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Patient‐reported adverse events were systematically collected. The mean age for the group was 76.5 ± 6.0 years, 81.8% were female and the most common principal diagnosis was major depression (88.6%). Doxepin was the most commonly prescribed antidepressant (29.5%), followed by nortriptyline (27.2%) and phenelzine (15.9%). Patients receiving lithium augmentation were less depressed and functioning better than those in the antidepressant alone treatment group—MADRS: 8.5 ± 8.8 vs 13.9 ± 9.0 ( p < 0.05); GAF: 77.9 ± 8.3 vs 68.5 ± 10.5 ( p < 0.01); ER: X 2 = 4.5 ( p < 0.05); GDS: 4.0 ± 2.7 vs 5.9 ± 4.3 (NS). Patients in the lithium group tended to report fewer adverse events (3.7 ± 2.1 vs 5.0 ± 3.0 (NS)). Results suggest that lithium augmented patients are less depressed and report fewer adverse events than those on antidepressants alone. Lithium appears to be a safe and effective addition to antidepressant pharmacotherapy in the elderly.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom