Premium
The relationship between basic, instrumental, and advanced activities of daily living and executive functioning in geriatric patients with neurocognitive disorders
Author(s) -
Cornelis Elise,
Gorus Ellen,
Van Schelvergem Nele,
De Vriendt Patricia
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of geriatric psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.28
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1099-1166
pISSN - 0885-6230
DOI - 10.1002/gps.5087
Subject(s) - activities of daily living , psychology , neurocognitive , test (biology) , cognition , executive functions , psychiatry , paleontology , biology
Objective Although many studies explored the relationship between executive functions (EF) and activities of daily living (ADLs) in cognitive disorders, previous studies used measurements without well‐defined levels of ADLs. This study explored the relationship between EF and the threefold classification of everyday functioning (basic or b‐, instrumental or i‐, and advanced or a‐ADLs) and examined how EF account for the variance in this triad of everyday functioning. Methods A sample of 44 cognitively healthy persons, 41 persons with mild cognitive impairment, and 35 persons with Alzheimer disease were assessed with comprehensive measures of EF and the b‐, i‐, and a‐ADL tools. Results Correlations demonstrated that subjects with higher executive dysfunctions have more limitations in b‐, i‐, and a‐ADLs. The highest significant correlations with measures of EF were seen in i‐ and a‐ADLs (ranging from r = −0.193 to r = −0.559, P < 0.05). However, correlations with a‐ADLs were not stronger than with i‐ADLs. The multivariate analyses revealed Trail Making Test A (TMT‐A) as a significant contributor of everyday functioning in b‐ADLs, as well as i‐ and a‐ADLs, and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and Animal Fluency Test (AFT) seemed to contribute significantly to variance in i‐ and a‐ADLs. Conclusions EF are less related to b‐ADLs than i‐ and a‐ADLs and contribute to the same amount of variance to limitations in both i‐ and a‐ADLs. This study recommends using the TMT‐A, CDT, and AFT as screening tools to indicate the need for profound evaluation of ADLs in older persons with neurocognitive disorders.