Premium
Validation of the Brazilian version of the Apathy Inventory
Author(s) -
Stella Florindo,
Andrade Larissa Pires,
Garuffi Marcelo,
Vital Thays Martins,
Hernández Salma Stephany Soleman,
Ruocco Marcela,
Sé Elisandra Villela Gasparetto,
Klein Margarete,
Martins Tânia,
Robert Philippe H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of geriatric psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.28
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1099-1166
pISSN - 0885-6230
DOI - 10.1002/gps.3917
Subject(s) - apathy , psychology , concurrent validity , depression (economics) , internal consistency , clinical psychology , psychiatry , psychometrics , cognition , economics , macroeconomics
Background Apathy is a frequent neuropsychiatric condition in neurodegenerative disorders, depression, and often in mild cognitive impairment. The Apathy Inventory (AI) is a reliable instrument for improving the accuracy of the apathy diagnosis. The aim was to establish the validity of the Apathy Inventory for the Brazilian community. Methods We established the concurrent validity, internal consistency, inter‐rater reliability, and the sensitivity and specificity of AI for the Brazilian community in a cohort of 175 individuals with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, depression, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy controls. The three dimensions of the AI (emotional blunting, lack of initiative, and lack of interest) were compared with the Apathy domain of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Clinician rating scale (NPI‐C) in an independent scheme. Results The analyses demonstrated high correlation coefficients in AI's individual dimensions and in AI‐total score ( F = 0.965). Concerning the NPI‐C/Apathy domain, intra‐class correlation coefficients were also high ( F = 0.977). Concurrent validity was high according to both raters on AI dimensions × NPI‐C/Apathy domain and regarding total score (rater 1: rho = 0.956 vs. rater 2: rho = 0.970). The internal consistency of the AI was also high concerning the AI's individual dimensions and total score (rater 1: 0.945 vs. rater 2: 0.958). Conclusion We observed high internal consistency, high concurrent validity, and inter‐rater reliability of the Apathy Inventory. In addition, we found that its sensitivity and specificity were high. We suggest that the Brazilian version of the Apathy Inventory would be an appropriate instrument to identify the apathy syndrome in Brazilian patients. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.