Premium
Developing multidisciplinary assessment—exploring the evidence from a social care perspective
Author(s) -
Sutcliffe Caroline,
Hughes Jane,
Abendstern Michele,
Clarkson Paul,
Challis David
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
international journal of geriatric psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.28
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1099-1166
pISSN - 0885-6230
DOI - 10.1002/gps.2069
Subject(s) - multidisciplinary approach , perspective (graphical) , psychology , medline , medicine , gerontology , psychotherapist , sociology , social science , political science , computer science , artificial intelligence , law
Background This paper provides an initial evaluation of the impact of the Single Assessment Process (SAP) in England upon practice regarding multidisciplinary assessment. Objectives To investigate changes in recorded health needs of older people and in the number of multidisciplinary assessments undertaken using social care agencies' case files. To examine differences in approaches to the use of multidisciplinary assessment for older people with different health needs. Methods An audit of case files of older people living in the community in receipt of social care in three areas carried out at two time periods before and after implementation of the SAP in 2004. Information extracted from files covered a number of domains including evidence of multidisciplinary assessments, and presence of mental and physical health problems. Results Data from 144 files at Time 1 were compared with 145 files from Time 2. Little evidence emerged that older people at Time 2 were more dependent. However, significantly more multidisciplinary assessments were undertaken following the introduction of the SAP, in particular by occupational therapists and secondary health care teams. Cognitive impairment was a significant predictor of multidisciplinary assessment at both time periods. Conclusions The impact of the introduction of the SAP has been mediated by the influence of other policies in England: intermediate care and integrated health and social care provision. Nevertheless, the data suggest that consideration be given to more effective targeting of multidisciplinary assessments on the grounds of both cost and more accurate identification of those who will benefit from the process. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.