Premium
Hypertension, white matter change and response to cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease
Author(s) -
Connelly Peter J.,
Prentice Neil P.,
Fowler Kenneth G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
international journal of geriatric psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.28
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1099-1166
pISSN - 0885-6230
DOI - 10.1002/gps.1331
Subject(s) - digit symbol substitution test , cholinesterase , medicine , blood pressure , population , alzheimer's disease , hyperintensity , dementia , analysis of variance , psychology , disease , cardiology , pathology , alternative medicine , environmental health , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , placebo
Background Cholinesterase inhibitors are used to treat mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Their role in patients with concurrent cerebrovascular disease has been less well studied, and the influence of vascular risk factors on response to treatment is uncertain. We investigated the effect of hypertension and white matter lesions (WML) on response. Methods A retrospective sample of 160 consecutive out‐patients who had blood pressure measured and the presence or absence of WML recorded at baseline and who completed six months treatment with a cholinesterase inhibitor was studied. Subjects scored either zero or one on the Modified Hachinski Ischaemic Scale. Subjects were assessed using the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSST) and both the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Social Behaviour (SB) sub‐scales of the Nurses Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). Results 43.9% of the total study population were classified as good responders using our criteria. Neither the presence of hypertension nor the presence of WML alone influenced outcome. However, there was a statistically significant interaction between blood pressure and WML on outcome variables on multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) ( F (4, 139) = 5.60, p < 0.0005). Subjects with both hypertension and WML deteriorate to a significantly greater extent in IADL and SB scores than any other group ( p < 0.05 in each case). This effect could not be explained by age or by smoking status. Conclusion Our results support the hypothesis that there is an interaction between hypertension and WML that adversely influences functional change during cholinesterase inhibitor treatment. Our results are a contrast to suggestions that subjects with vascular disease show a better response to cholinesterase inhibitors. We recommend careful exploration of factors that may influence outcome. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.