z-logo
Premium
Sex differences in glia reactivity after cortical brain injury
Author(s) -
AcazFonseca Estefania,
Duran Juan C.,
Carrero Paloma,
GarciaSegura Luis M.,
Arevalo M. Angeles
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
glia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.954
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1098-1136
pISSN - 0894-1491
DOI - 10.1002/glia.22867
Subject(s) - gliosis , biology , microglia , neuroprotection , neuroinflammation , lesion , sexual dimorphism , astrocyte , sex characteristics , neuroglia , neuroscience , inflammation , central nervous system , medicine , endocrinology , pathology , immunology
Several brain disorders associated with neuroinflammation show sex differences in their incidence, onset, progression and/or outcome. The different regulation of the neuroinflammatory response in males and females could underlie these sex differences. In this study, we have explored whether reactive gliosis after a penetrating cortical injury exhibits sex differences. Males presented a higher density of Iba1 immunoreactive cells in the proximity of the wound (0–220 μm) than females. This sex difference was due to a higher number of Iba1 immunoreactive cells with nonreactive morphology. In addition microglia/macrophages in that region expressed arginase‐1, marker of alternatively activated microglia, and the neuroprotective protein Neuroglobin, in a greater proportion in males than in females. No sex differences were found in the number of astrocytes around the lesion. However, the percentage of astrocytes expressing chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), involved in recruitment of immune cells and gliosis regulation, was higher in males. Males also presented a significantly higher density of neurons in the lesion edge than females. These findings indicate that male and female mice have different neuroinflammatory responses after a cortical stab wound injury and suggest that sex differences in reactive gliosis may contribute to sex differences in neuroinflammatory diseases. GLIA 2015;63:1966–1981

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here