Premium
On scale and magnitude of pressure build‐up induced by large‐scale geologic storage of CO 2
Author(s) -
Zhou Quanlin,
Birkholzer Jens T.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg3.1
Subject(s) - caprock , geology , sedimentary basin , structural basin , cabin pressurization , sedimentary rock , carbon capture and storage (timeline) , brine , carbon sequestration , drilling , petroleum engineering , petrology , environmental science , soil science , hydrology (agriculture) , geotechnical engineering , climate change , geomorphology , geochemistry , carbon dioxide , ecology , oceanography , physics , biology , thermodynamics , mechanical engineering , aerospace engineering , engineering
The scale and magnitude of pressure perturbation and brine migration induced by geologic carbon sequestration is discussed assuming a full‐scale deployment scenario in which enough CO 2 is captured and stored to make relevant contributions to global climate change mitigation. In this scenario, the volumetric rates and cumulative volumes of CO 2 injection would be comparable to or higher than those related to existing deep‐subsurface injection and extraction activities, such as oil production. Large‐scale pressure build‐up in response to the injection may limit the dynamic storage capacity of suitable formations, because over‐pressurization may fracture the caprock, may drive CO 2 /brine leakage through localized pathways, and may cause induced seismicity. On the other hand, laterally extensive sedimentary basins may be less affected by such limitations because (i) local pressure effects are moderated by pressure propagation and brine displacement into regions far away from the CO 2 storage domain; and (ii) diffuse and/or localized brine migration into overlying and underlying formations allows for pressure bleed‐off in the vertical direction. A quick analytical estimate of the extent of pressure build‐up induced by industrial‐scale CO 2 storage projects is presented. Also discussed are pressure perturbation and attenuation effects simulated for two representative sedimentary basins in the USA: the laterally extensive Illinois Basin and the partially compartmentalized southern San Joaquin Basin in California. These studies show that the limiting effect of pressure build‐up on dynamic storage capacity is not as significant as suggested by Ehlig‐Economides and Economides, who considered closed systems without any attenuation effects. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd