z-logo
Premium
Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS or Bio‐CCS)
Author(s) -
Gough Clair,
Upham Paul
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.34
Subject(s) - bio energy with carbon capture and storage , carbon capture and storage (timeline) , biomass (ecology) , environmental science , climate change mitigation , bioenergy , fossil fuel , greenhouse gas , waste management , environmental protection , biofuel , engineering , climate change , oceanography , geology
In terms of climate mitigation options, the theoretical potential of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is substantial; introducing the prospect of negative emissions, it offers the vision of drawing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations back down to pre‐industrial levels. This paper reviews issues raised at a workshop on BECCS, convened in Scotland in late 2009. Presentations by bioenergy and CCS specialists covered topics including the climate policy rationale for BECCS, global biomass CCS potential, the UK potential for BECCS, the risk of fossil fuel lock‐in via coal co‐firing, and carbon market issues. In practice, the scale of the forestry and accessible CCS infrastructure required are among the obstacles to the large‐scale deployment of BECCS in the near term. While biomass co‐firing with coal offers an early route to BECCS, a quite substantial (>20%) biomass component may be necessary to achieve negative emissions in a co‐fired CCS system. Smaller scale BECCS, through co‐location of dedicated or co‐combusted biomass on fossil CCS CO 2 transport pipeline routes, is easier to envisage and would be potentially less problematic. Hence, we judge that BECCS can, and likely will, play a role in carbon reduction, but care needs to be taken not to exaggerate its potential, given that (i) there are few studies of the cost of connecting bio‐processing (combustion, gasification or other) infrastructure with CO 2 storage sites and (ii) that scenarios of global bioenergy potential remain contentious. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here