Premium
Comparison of CO 2 absorption performance between methyl‐di‐ ethanolamine and tri‐ethanolamine solution systems and its analysis in terms of amine molecules
Author(s) -
Han SangJun,
Wee JungHo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.2059
Subject(s) - ethanolamine , amine gas treating , protonation , chemistry , absorption (acoustics) , tertiary amine , molecule , moiety , ionic bonding , ionic liquid , zwitterion , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , catalysis , materials science , ion , composite material
Abstract The present study analyzes the features of chemical CO 2 absorption using tertiary amine solvents by comparing the absorption performance and electrical properties between methyl‐di‐ethanolamine (MDEA) and tri‐ethanolamine (TEA) systems. The results are mostly attributed to the different structures of the two amine molecules. Absorption performance is significantly affected by the molecular structure and water concentration in the amine solution. The absorption performance of the MDEA system is better than that of TEA, which is basically ascribed to the MDEA molecule's more asymmetric and irregular shape than that of TEA, which thus enhances the catalytic activity of MDEA and the reactivity of the −OH moiety in water. The difference of electrical properties such as ionic conductivities (ICs) of the two protonated amines and real ionic activity coefficients (RIAC) between the two systems might be also caused by the different molecular structures of the two amines. The IC of protonated MDEA is estimated to be 23.70% higher than that of protonated TEA, because of the higher ionic mobility and charge density of MDEA. The RIAC of the MDEA system is higher than that of TEA, which is explained by the different physicochemical interactions between the molecules in the two systems. Since water is one of the reactants in the absorption, its concentration in solution significantly affects the results of the systems. In addition, the absorption using tertiary amine is a base‐catalyzed reaction, and thus variations of the overall absorption rate follow a parabolic curve. Therefore, it is maximized to be 14.2 and 9.8 mmol CO 2 ·L −1 ·min −1 in the 15 wt% MDEA and TEA solutions, respectively. Finally, the correlated equations for in situ estimation of chemical absorption capacity by electrical conductivity measured during the absorption are derived in the two systems. © 2021 The Authors. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.