Premium
Effects of variable injection rate on reservoir responses and implications for CO 2 storage in saline aquifers
Author(s) -
Li Cai,
Maggi Federico,
Zhang Keni,
Guo Chaobin,
Gan Yixiang,
ElZein Abbas,
Pan Zhejun,
Shen Luming
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.1888
Subject(s) - injection site , aquifer , water injection (oil production) , saline , residual , petroleum engineering , carbon dioxide , injection well , environmental science , solubility , hydrology (agriculture) , chemistry , geology , geotechnical engineering , anesthesia , groundwater , biomedical engineering , mathematics , medicine , organic chemistry , algorithm
Past reservoir simulations of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) storage in saline aquifers have shown that the injection procedure can influence CO 2 storage efficiency and injectivity. To investigate the influence of injection rate and timing on reservoir dynamics and storage performance, scenarios of continuous and intermittent injections were devised for storing 1 million tonnes of CO 2 per year for 30 years and were assessed through numerical simulations on saline aquifers constructed with real field data. Our results show that almost all the intermittent injections need higher injection pressure than the constant injection for the same targeted amount of CO 2 . Only one intermittent injection showed the potential to have a lower injection pressure than the constant injection. The injectivity for the constant injection consistently declines over the years, while the intermittent injections result in an injectivity above a reference value for some years, with the number of years that maintain the injectivity linearly increasing with the length of the injection break. The injectivity for an intermittent injection peaks a few years later after the injection starts. Intermittent injections improve the residual and solubility trapping by up to 15% only in the first few years of injection, but the differences in trapping efficiencies among all the injections are within a few percent in the long term. Therefore, the intermittent injections would be useful for a CO 2 storage project to make the best use of a reservoir in 5–10 years under the injection pressure restrictions. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.