Premium
Enhancement of CO 2 trapping efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs by water‐alternating gas injection
Author(s) -
AlKhdheeawi Emad A.,
Vialle Stephanie,
Barifcani Ahmed,
Sarmadivaleh Mohammad,
Iglauer Stefan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.1805
Subject(s) - caprock , plume , petroleum engineering , aquifer , brine , water injection (oil production) , salinity , trapping , residual , environmental science , chemistry , environmental engineering , groundwater , geology , geotechnical engineering , thermodynamics , ecology , physics , oceanography , organic chemistry , algorithm , biology , computer science
Carbon geosequestration efficiency is affected by various factors including reservoir heterogeneity, caprock properties, rock wettability, aquifer brine salinity and injection‐well configuration. Some parameters (e.g. the formation geology) cannot be changed but it is possible to select others and engineer an optimized storage program. One of these parameters is the way CO 2 is injected into the reservoir. There are three main options for this: (1) continuous injection, (2) intermittent injection, and (3) water‐alternating gas (WAG) injection. We thus studied the efficiency of each injection option and predicted the associated storage capacities and CO 2 ‐plume movements (which are related to the containment security). We found that WAG injection showed significantly superior behavior over continuous and intermittent injections (which resulted in similar CO 2 flow responses). Specifically, residual and solubility trapping were significantly enhanced, whereas vertical CO 2 migration was cut by approximately two‐thirds. Thus, in the examined reservoir, the WAG injection is preferred as it strongly enhances CO 2 storage efficiency and containment security. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.