z-logo
Premium
Impacts of injection pressure of a dip‐angle sloping strata reservoir with low porosity and permeability on CO 2 injection amount
Author(s) -
Wang Fugang,
Jing Jing,
Yang Yanlin,
Liu Hongyan,
Sun Zhaojun,
Xu Tianfu,
Tian Hailong
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.1615
Subject(s) - magnetic dip , porosity , permeability (electromagnetism) , geology , water injection (oil production) , injection site , geotechnical engineering , petroleum engineering , chemistry , biochemistry , membrane , geophysics , biomedical engineering , medicine
Sloping strata reservoirs with low porosity and permeability are widely distributed in China. The first CO 2 capture and geological storage (CCS) demonstration project in China that has been constructed in the Ordos Basin is a representative. In this paper, a 3D numerical model was constructed to evaluate the influence of injection pressure and strata dip angle on the CO 2 injection amount in a sloping strata reservoir during CO 2 injection period. We reached the following conclusions: (i) There is a ‘balance time point (BTP)’ for the total CO 2 injection amount between a horizontal reservoir and a sloping one, and the BTP will decrease with the injection pressure increase. (ii) The influence of the dip angle of a sloping reservoir on the total injection amount is non‐monotonicity. For a fixed injection pressure, before the BTP, the greater the dip angle, the greater the CO 2 injection amount, but after the BTP, the change rule is reversed. (iii) The injection pressure significantly affected the total injected CO 2 amount, but the influence of the dip angle (in the range of 0° to 15°) on the total injection amount was not significant during injection. (iv) To a sloping reservoir, for long time injection (i.e., injection time is longer than the BTP), the bigger the dip angle, the greater the distance of the CO 2 upward migration, and the smaller the total injected amount compared to the horizontal reservoir. So, in actual site selection of a CCS project, the small dip angle reservoir was beneficial. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom