Premium
Carbon dioxide capture and storage by pH swing mineralization using recyclable ammonium salts and flue gas mixtures
Author(s) -
Wang Xiaolong,
Sanna Aimaro,
MarotoValer M. Mercedes,
Paulson Tom
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.1494
Subject(s) - carbonation , flue gas , chemistry , carbon dioxide , carbon sequestration , nox , mineralization (soil science) , chemical engineering , mineralogy , organic chemistry , combustion , nitrogen , engineering
CO 2 mineral sequestration through the employment of silicate rocks such as serpentine is an important technology for the mitigation of CO 2 emissions. Most mineral carbonation works in this study use pure CO 2 . The indirect carbonation process employed different flue gases (5, 15, 25% CO 2 ) and the presence of SOx and NOx. Also, the direct contact of CO 2 with the Mg source was compared to the indirect reaction of Mg with CO 2 as NH 4 CO 3 . The impact of variables such as temperature, solid‐liquid ration (S/L), and molar ratio of additives on carbonation rate and degree was studied. An average carbonation efficiency of about 90% was achieved at 80°C after 30 min for indirect mineral carbonation process. The carbonation efficiency decreased to 50‒60% when the process was directly employed. The carbonation efficiency obtained in the presence of 15‒25% CO 2 was very similar to that with 100% CO 2 at 140°C, while at 80°C, the carbonation efficiency in presence of flue gas (40‒55%) was much larger compared to that using pure C0 2 (10% after 3 h). SOx and NOx co‐removal efficiency was 54.4% and 18% at 140˚C and 20 bar, respectively.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom