Premium
Storage compliance in coupled CO 2 ‐EOR and storage
Author(s) -
Ettehad Amin
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
greenhouse gases: science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.45
H-Index - 32
ISSN - 2152-3878
DOI - 10.1002/ghg.1382
Subject(s) - storage efficiency , environmental science , enhanced oil recovery , economic shortage , petroleum engineering , water storage , storage tank , aquifer , oil storage , reliability engineering , waste management , process engineering , engineering , environmental engineering , computer science , groundwater , geotechnical engineering , mechanical engineering , linguistics , philosophy , database , government (linguistics) , inlet
Abstract CO 2 storage compliance refers to the safe and consistent storage of a captured anthropogenic CO 2 slug in an underground geological structure. This paper investigates the storage compliance in coupled CO 2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage projects. Storage compliance requires an oilfield operator to maintain sufficient CO 2 injection and storage capacities throughout an industrial‐scale CO 2 capture and EOR‐storage operation. We investigate the uncertainty in two operational parameters that may raise a compliance consideration: annual captured CO 2 from the power plant and CO 2 injection loss in the oilfield. The objective is to maintain sufficient CO 2 injection and storage capacities and maximize the economic benefits from the EOR‐storage operation. We formulate and optimize the storage compliance problem using the method of optimization with Monte Carlo simulation. The results show that appropriate adjustment of the water‐alternating‐gas (WAG) ratio increases both the compliance and the economic benefits. Also, a CO 2 storage back‐up in a saline aquifer allows the oilfield operator to implement more profitable EOR‐storage designs. A risk‐seeking operator may practice the saline aquifer back‐up option to simultaneously maximize the benefits and mitigate the risk of storage capacity shortage. Finally, EOR‐storage operation is less efficient than aquifer storage in terms of storage efficiency, and considerably more profitable in terms of tangible economic benefits.