Premium
Determining Which Phenotypes Underlie a Pleiotropic Signal
Author(s) -
Majumdar Arunabha,
Haldar Tanushree,
Witte John S.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
genetic epidemiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.301
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1098-2272
pISSN - 0741-0395
DOI - 10.1002/gepi.21973
Subject(s) - phenotype , biology , genetics , evolutionary biology , computational biology , gene
Discovering pleiotropic loci is important to understand the biological basis of seemingly distinct phenotypes. Most methods for assessing pleiotropy only test for the overall association between genetic variants and multiple phenotypes. To determine which specific traits are pleiotropic, we evaluate via simulation and application three different strategies. The first is model selection techniques based on the inverse regression of genotype on phenotypes. The second is a subset‐based meta analysis ASSET [Bhattacharjee et al., [Bhattacharjee S, 2012]], which provides an optimal subset of nonnull traits. And the third is a modified Benjamini–Hochberg (B‐H) procedure of controlling the expected false discovery rate [Benjamini and Hochberg, [Benjamini Y, 1995]] in the framework of phenome‐wide association study. From our simulations we see that an inverse regression‐based approach MultiPhen [O'Reilly et al., [O'Reilly PF, 2012]] is more powerful than ASSET for detecting overall pleiotropic association, except for when all the phenotypes are associated and have genetic effects in the same direction. For determining which specific traits are pleiotropic, the modified B–H procedure performs consistently better than the other two methods. The inverse regression‐based selection methods perform competitively with the modified B–H procedure only when the phenotypes are weakly correlated. The efficiency of ASSET is observed to lie below and in between the efficiency of the other two methods when the traits are weakly and strongly correlated, respectively. In our application to a large GWAS, we find that the modified B–H procedure also performs well, indicating that this may be an optimal approach for determining the traits underlying a pleiotropic signal.