z-logo
Premium
On the border between land and water: The environmental conditions of the Neolithic occupation from 4.3 until 1.6 ka BC at Serteya, Western Russia
Author(s) -
Kittel Piotr,
Mazurkevich Andrey,
WieckowskaLüth Magda,
Pawłowski Dominik,
Dolbunova Ekaterina,
Płóciennik Mateusz,
Gauthier Emilie,
Krąpiec Marek,
Maigrot Yolaine,
Danger Maxime,
Mroczkowska Agnieszka,
Okupny Daniel,
Szmańda Jacek,
Thiebaut Eva,
Słowiński Michał
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
geoarchaeology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.696
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1520-6548
pISSN - 0883-6353
DOI - 10.1002/gea.21824
Subject(s) - wetland , radiocarbon dating , geography , archaeology , shore , ecology , physical geography , geology , oceanography , biology
The paper presents the results of a palaeoecological study of Neolithic archaeological layers from a wetland, multilayer site, Serteya II (Western Russia). It contains, domestic structures, rich organic artefacts, skeletons, and ecofacts preserved within lacustrine deposits that are extremely important on a European scale. We employed a set of specialised palaeoecological analyses and accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dating to identify the principal environmental conditions which attracted Neolithic hunter‐fisher‐gatherer communities from 4300 to 1600 cal. BC. The distinct impact of communities using a nonproductive economy on the ecology of the palaeolake shore zone was recorded. Also, palaeolake water level changes influenced the palaeoeconomic activity of local Neolithic societies, such as gathering of plants (for the medicinal use or serving as dietary components), fishing activities, and possible funeral practices. In addition, the identified phases of high‐water level changes, which were responses to climatic oscillations, were correlated with supraregional climatic events, especially ca. 6.2, 5.9, and 4.2 ka cal. BP. Thus, our results allowed for the reconstruction of environment transformations and conditions of Neolithic communities' activity, as well as for a better understanding of the relationships between local Neolithic communities' way of life and neolithisation processes in Eastern Europe.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here