z-logo
Premium
Defining the position of the breakpoint of the constitutional t(3;6) occurring in a family with renal cell carcinoma
Author(s) -
van den Berg Anke,
van der Veen Anneke Y.,
Hulsbeek Miriam M. F.,
Kovacs Gyula,
Gemmill Robert M.,
Drabkin Harry A.,
Buys Charles H. C. M.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
genes, chromosomes and cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.754
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1098-2264
pISSN - 1045-2257
DOI - 10.1002/gcc.2870120311
Subject(s) - breakpoint , chromosomal translocation , biology , metaphase , interphase , fluorescence in situ hybridization , karyotype , genetics , cytogenetics , microbiology and biotechnology , chromosome , gene
In a family with a constitutional translocation t(3;6), the oldest member carrying the translocation had developed multiple nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The translocation breakpoint was positioned between 3p13 and 3p14.1. This is close to the region in which a t(3;8) breakpoint has been reported in a family with hereditary RCC. We defined the location of the t(3;6) and t(3;8) breakpoints by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) from the 3p14–13 region. Both interphase nuclei and metaphase cells from translocation‐carrying members of both families have been used, allowing the definition of flanking YACs for each breakpoint. We could thereby clearly confirm that the breakpoints are different, the t(3;8) breakpoint being most distal. In addition, we have shown that both translocation breakpoints are located distal to the homozygously deleted region in the U2020 lung cancer cell line.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here