Premium
Reply to RIVLIN's Material symmetry revisited or Much Ado About Nothing
Author(s) -
Bertram A.,
Svendsen B.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
gamm‐mitteilungen
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.239
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1522-2608
pISSN - 0936-7195
DOI - 10.1002/gamm.201490004
Subject(s) - nothing , symmetry (geometry) , simple (philosophy) , frame (networking) , minor (academic) , frame of reference , theoretical physics , physics , computer science , philosophy , epistemology , mathematics , quantum mechanics , geometry , humanities , telecommunications
In a recent paper, Rivlin (2002) ”revised” the concepts of material symmetry and strongly criticises the approach to symmetry and frame‐indifference by Truesdell and Noll (1964). A simple comparison of these approaches, however, leads us to the conclusion that ‐ apart from some minor and irrelevant differences ‐ the two approaches have more in common than Rivlin concedes. To show this, we will brießy describe these two approaches and then show how they are related to each other. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom