Open AccessEffect of three kinds of natural preservative cocktails on vacuum‐packed chilled pork
Author(s) -
Li Chen,
Han Yuhang,
Fan Sanhong,
Ma Lizhen,
Zhang Yi,
Simpson Benjamin Kofi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
food science and nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.614
H-Index - 27
ISSN - 2048-7177
DOI - 10.1002/fsn3.1535
Subject(s) - preservative , food science , chemistry , nisin , vacuum packing , fermentation , cold storage , food preservation , bacterial growth , antimicrobial , bacteria , biology , organic chemistry , genetics , horticulture
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three different natural preservatives on the microbial profile, the total volatile base nitrogen (TVB‐N), and biogenic amine contents of vacuum‐packed chilled pork during storage at 4°C. Solution A comprised of tea polyphenols, chitosan, spice extract, propolis, and nisin. Solution B comprised of clove extract, cassia bark extract, ginger juice, garlic juice, and lactobacillus fermentation solution. Solution C consisted of only lactobacillus fermentation solution. The results indicated that solution A was a good natural preservative with higher bacteria inhibitory effect and higher sensory score than B and C. Besides the effect on appealing color, solution B could inhibit microbial activity although its inhibition effect was not as good as solution A. Thus, solution A could be used as a good preservative in industry. Solution C could inhibit the initial growth of Pseudomonas and partially inhibited the growth of Enterobacteriaceae ; however, the content of putrescine in the pork treated with solution C was as high as 30.14 ± 2.89 mg/kg after 21 days of storage at 4°C. Hence, solution C is not an ideal preservative for vacuum‐packed chilled pork.