Embracing Advocacy in Science

Scientists have the unique knowledge and insight to advocate for science-based policy. Scientists are poised to be effective advocates, because they understand the process and power of science. Yet, a perception remains that scientists cannot be objective and credible while also advocating a position that may inform or impact decision making. We counter this notion and make the case that scientists should engage in science communication and advocacy. We define advocacy as arguing for a position that has the support of verifiable facts, and may be used to influence decision making or effect policy change. We present a historical context for current science-policy and advocacy paradigms and suggest guidelines, based on our collective experiences, for engaging in science communication and advocacy. The guidelines presented are applicable to scientists and professionals across disciplines — including graduate students — and can be used either as a private citizen or representative of an institution.