z-logo
Premium
Professional economic forecasts: Are they worth their costs?
Author(s) -
Leitch Gordon,
Ernesttanner J.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of forecasting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.543
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1099-131X
pISSN - 0277-6693
DOI - 10.1002/for.3980140206
Subject(s) - forecast error , survey of professional forecasters , econometrics , consensus forecast , economics , actuarial science , macroeconomics , monetary policy
Most economic forecast evaluations dating back 20 years show that professional forecasters add little to the forecasts generated by the simplest of models. Using various types of forecast error criteria, these evaluations usually conclude that the professional forecasts are little better than the no‐change or ARIM A type forecast. It is our contention that this conclusion is mistaken because the conventional error criteria may not capture why forecasts are ma& or how they are used. Using forecast directional accuracy, the criterion which has been found to be highly correlated with profits in an interest rate setting, we find that professional GNP forecasts dominate the cheaper alternatives. Moreover, there appears to be no systematic relationship between this preferred criterion and the error measures used in previous studies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here