z-logo
Premium
On the limitations of comparing mean square forecast errors
Author(s) -
Clements Michael P.,
Hendry David F.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of forecasting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.543
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1099-131X
pISSN - 0277-6693
DOI - 10.1002/for.3980120802
Subject(s) - invariant (physics) , econometrics , ranking (information retrieval) , mathematics , monte carlo method , dominance (genetics) , statistics , computer science , artificial intelligence , biochemistry , chemistry , mathematical physics , gene
Linear models are invariant under non‐singular, scale‐preserving linear transformations, whereas mean square forecast errors (MSFEs) are not. Different rankings may result across models or methods from choosing alternative yet isomorphic representations of a process. One approach can dominate others for comparisons in levels, yet lose to another for differences, to a second for cointegrating vectors and to a third for combinations of variables. The potential for switches in ranking is related to criticisms of the inadequacy of MSFE against encompassing criteria, which are invariant under linear transforms and entail MSFE dominance. An invariant evaluation criterion which avoids misleading outcomes is examined in a Monte Carlo study of forecasting methods.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here