Premium
Term Structure Forecasting: No‐Arbitrage Restrictions versus Large Information Set
Author(s) -
Favero Carlo A.,
Niu Linlin,
Sala Luca
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of forecasting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.543
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1099-131X
pISSN - 0277-6693
DOI - 10.1002/for.1181
Subject(s) - yield curve , arbitrage , econometrics , term (time) , set (abstract data type) , economics , computer science , yield (engineering) , data set , financial economics , interest rate , finance , artificial intelligence , physics , materials science , quantum mechanics , programming language , metallurgy
This paper addresses the issue of forecasting term structure. We provide a unified state‐space modeling framework that encompasses different existing discrete‐time yield curve models. Within such a framework we analyze the impact of two modeling choices, namely the imposition of no‐arbitrage restrictions and the size of the information set used to extract factors, on forecasting performance. Using US yield curve data, we find that both no‐arbitrage and large information sets help in forecasting but no model uniformly dominates the other. No‐arbitrage models are more useful at shorter horizons for shorter maturities. Large information sets are more useful at longer horizons and longer maturities. We also find evidence for a significant feedback from yield curve models to macroeconomic variables that could be exploited for macroeconomic forecasting. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.