z-logo
Premium
Influence of spatial discretization and unsteadiness on the simulation of rocket combustors
Author(s) -
Lempke Markus,
Keller Roman,
Gerlinger Peter
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in fluids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.938
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1097-0363
pISSN - 0271-2091
DOI - 10.1002/fld.4059
Subject(s) - reynolds averaged navier–stokes equations , combustor , rocket (weapon) , discretization , mechanics , rotational symmetry , aerospace engineering , heat flux , computational fluid dynamics , physics , combustion , engineering , mathematics , heat transfer , chemistry , mathematical analysis , organic chemistry
Summary This paper investigates some important numerical aspects for the simulation of model rocket combustors. Precisely, (1) a new high‐order discretization technique (multi‐dimensional limiting process (MLP), low diffusion, and MLP l d ) is presented and compared with conventional second‐order schemes with different flux limiters. (2) Time accurate unsteady Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations are performed to assess possible improvements in comparison with steady‐state RANS simulations. (3) Fully 3D simulations of an axisymmetric rocket combustor are compared with 2D axisymmetric ones. All studies are based on the Penn State preburner combustor experiment, which uses gaseous oxygen and hydrogen. This comprehensive study offers unique insight into how the mentioned numerical influence factors change the flow field, flame, and wall heat fluxes in the model rocket combustor. Because wall heat fluxes are known from the experiment only, numerical results are compared with LES of other authors, too. It will be shown that the high‐order spatial discretization significantly improves the agreement with measured wall heat fluxes at low additional computational cost. In general the transition from simple to more complex numerical approaches steadily improves the qualitative agreement between simulation and experiment. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here