Premium
Volume preserving immersed boundary methods for two‐phase fluid flows
Author(s) -
Li Yibao,
Jung Eunok,
Lee Wanho,
Lee Hyun Geun,
Kim Junseok
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in fluids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.938
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1097-0363
pISSN - 0271-2091
DOI - 10.1002/fld.2616
Subject(s) - immersed boundary method , volume of fluid method , mechanics , boundary (topology) , flow (mathematics) , eulerian path , boundary value problem , fluid dynamics , fluid mechanics , ibm , two phase flow , computational fluid dynamics , surface tension , interface (matter) , finite volume method , conservation of mass , physics , mathematics , mathematical analysis , capillary number , lagrangian , quantum mechanics , optics
SUMMARY In this article, we propose a simple area‐preserving correction scheme for two‐phase immiscible incompressible flows with an immersed boundary method (IBM). The IBM was originally developed to model blood flow in the heart and has been widely applied to biofluid dynamics problems with complex geometries and immersed elastic membranes. The main idea of the IBM is to use a regular Eulerian computational grid for the fluid mechanics along with a Lagrangian representation of the immersed boundary. Using the discrete Dirac delta function and the indicator function, we can include the surface tension force, variable viscosity and mass density, and gravitational force effects. The principal advantage of the IBM for two‐phase fluid flows is its inherent accuracy due in part to its ability to use a large number of interfacial marker points on the interface. However, because the interface between two fluids is moved in a discrete manner, this can result in a lack of volume conservation. The idea of an area preserving correction scheme is to correct the interface location normally to the interface so that the area remains constant. Various numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed conservative IBM for two‐phase fluid flows. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.