Premium
Toward accurate hybrid prediction techniques for cavity flow noise applications
Author(s) -
De Roeck W.,
Rubio G.,
Baelmans M.,
Desmet W.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in fluids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.938
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1097-0363
pISSN - 0271-2091
DOI - 10.1002/fld.2001
Subject(s) - euler equations , acoustics , physics , computational aeroacoustics , aeroacoustics , vortex , acoustic source localization , finite volume method , harmonics , acoustic wave , mechanics , sound pressure , quantum mechanics , voltage
A large variety of hybrid computational aeroacoustics (CAA) approaches exist differing from each other in the way the source region is modeled, in the way the equations are used to compute the propagation of acoustic waves in a non‐quiescent medium, and in the way the coupling between source and acoustic propagation regions is made. This paper makes a comparison between some commonly used numerical methods for aeroacoustic applications. The aerodynamically generated tonal noise by a flow over a 2D rectangular cavity is investigated. Two different cavities are studied. In the first cavity ( L / D =4, M =0.5), the sound field is dominated by the cavity wake mode and its higher harmonics, originating from a periodical vortex shedding at the cavity leading edge. In the second cavity ( L / D =2, M =0.6), shear‐layer modes, due to flow‐acoustic interaction phenomena, generate the major components in the noise spectrum. Source domain modeling is carried out using a second‐order finite‐volume large eddy simulation. Propagation equations, taking into account convection and refraction effects, are solved using high‐order finite‐difference schemes for the linearized Euler equations and the acoustic perturbation equations. Both schemes are compared with each other for various coupling methods between source region and acoustic region. Conventional acoustic analogies and Kirchhoff methods are rewritten for the various propagation equations and used to obtain near‐field acoustic results. The accuracy of the various coupling methods in identifying the noise‐generating mechanisms is evaluated. In this way, this paper provides more insight into the practical use of various hybrid CAA techniques to predict the aerodynamically generated sound field by a flow over rectangular cavities. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.