Open AccessImpacts of abiotic stresses on the physiology and metabolism of cool‐season grasses: A review
Author(s) -
Loka Dimitra,
Harper John,
Humphreys Mike,
Gasior Dagmara,
Wootton-Beard Peter,
GwynnJones Dylan,
Scullion John,
Doonan John,
KingstonSmith Alison,
Dodd Rosalind,
Wang Jinyang,
Chadwick David,
Hill Paul,
Jones Davey,
Mills Gina,
Hayes Felicity,
Robinson David
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
food and energy security
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 25
ISSN - 2048-3694
DOI - 10.1002/fes3.152
Subject(s) - abiotic component , environmental science , temperate climate , climate change , agronomy , abiotic stress , food security , ecology , photosynthesis , biomass (ecology) , global warming , biology , agriculture , botany , biochemistry , gene
Grasslands cover more than 70% of the world's agricultural land playing a pivotal role in global food security, economy, and ecology due to their flexibility and functionality. Climate change, characterized by changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, and by increased levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, is anticipated to increase both the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as drought, heat waves, and flooding. Potentially, climate change could severely compromise future forage crop production and should be considered a direct threat to food security. This review aimed to summarize our current understanding of the physiological and metabolic responses of temperate grasses to those abiotic stresses associated with climate change. Primarily, substantial decreases in photosynthetic rates of cool‐season grasses occur as a result of high temperatures, water‐deficit or water‐excess, and elevated ozone, but not CO 2 concentrations. Those decreases are usually attributed to stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations. Additionally, while membrane instability and reactive oxygen species production was a common feature of the abiotic stress response, total antioxidant capacity showed a stress‐specific response. Furthermore, climate change‐related stresses altered carbohydrate partitioning, with implications for biomass production. While water‐deficit stress, increased CO 2 , and ozone concentrations resulted in higher carbohydrate content, the opposite occurred under conditions of heat stress and flooding. The extent of damage is greatly dependent on location, as well as the type and intensity of stress. Fortunately, temperate forage grass species are highly heterogeneous. Consequently, through intra‐ and in particular inter‐specific plant hybridization (e.g., Festuca x Lolium hybrids) new opportunities are available to harness, within single genotypes, gene combinations capable of combating climate change.