Premium
Comparing simple and advanced tools for structural fire safety engineering
Author(s) -
Henneton Nicolas,
Renaud Christophe,
Zhao Bin
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
fire and materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.482
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1099-1018
pISSN - 0308-0501
DOI - 10.1002/fam.2268
Subject(s) - computational fluid dynamics , fire protection engineering , relevance (law) , field (mathematics) , computer science , simple (philosophy) , frame (networking) , fire safety , engineering , industrial engineering , mechanical engineering , aerospace engineering , civil engineering , mathematics , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law , pure mathematics
Summary The present paper gives an overview of the actual tools available for the estimation of the fire development and of the resulting thermal actions on structural members. A case study is developed on the basis of the Fire Safety Engineering methodology, respectively with two different approaches, one based on ‘advanced’ tools and another one based on ‘simplified’ tools. Indeed, three categories of fire models are used in this study, each of which corresponding to a different level of precision and complexity: hand calculations, zone models, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. The case study is relative to the calculation of the heating of a portal frame in a gymnasium, under localised real fire conditions. It is shown through comparisons that, in this case, predictions of analytical methods are, to certain extent, in good agreement with predictions of the CFD model. In particular, it is demonstrated the relevance of using a simplified method of EN 1991‐1‐2 to predict thermal actions to vertical members. The obtained results also highlight the need to develop more relevant analytical methods in order to predict the temperature field during a fire in a large volume. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.