The role of time and timing in hominid dental evolution

Exactly when during evolution hominids acquired their extended extra‐uterine growth period is a contentious issue. In order to shed light on the tempo and mode of ontogenetic changes during hominid evolution, research has focused on the pattern and, to a lesser extent, the rate of growth observed in the developing dentition of extant and extinct hominoid taxa. From these data, the absolute timing of events has often been inferred, either implicitly or explicitly. Differences in patterns of growth, especially of the eruption of teeth, are reasonably well documented among hominoids. However, data on the absolute timing of dental developmental events are much more scarce, rendering tentative all inferences about timing from patterns alone. Such inferences are even more tentative when they involve interpreting ontogenetic trajectories in extinct species such as Plio‐Pleistocene hominids, which almost certainly had unique patterns of maturation. In order to contribute to the debate about possible relations between pattern and timing in the developing dentition, we have collated information that specifically relates to the absolute timing of developmental events in extant and extinct hominoids and, hence, also to the rate at which processes occur. In doing so, we have attempted to identify both developmental constraints and possible heterochronic processes that may have led to the extended growth period characteristic of humans. There appears to be growing evidence that evolution toward an extended hominid ontogeny did not follow a path that can be described as a simple heterochronic event.