Premium
How big were early hominids?
Author(s) -
McHenry Henry M.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
evolutionary anthropology: issues, news, and reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1520-6505
pISSN - 1060-1538
DOI - 10.1002/evan.1360010106
Subject(s) - postcrania , australopithecus , hominidae , biology , brain size , paleoanthropology , human evolution , encephalization , homo erectus , zoology , body weight , bipedalism , taphonomy , body proportions , evolutionary biology , paleontology , biological evolution , pleistocene , taxon , mathematics , medicine , genetics , geometry , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , endocrinology
The recent discovery of new postcranial fossils, particularly associated body parts, of several Plio‐Pleistocene hominids provides a new opportunity to assess body size in human evolution. 1 Body size plays a central role in the biology of animals because of its relationship to brain size, feeding behavior, habitat preference, social behavior, and much more. Unfortunately, the prediction of body weight from fossils is inherently inaccurate because skeletal size does not reflect body size exactly and because the fossils are from species having body proportions for which there are no analogues among modern species. The approach here is to find the relationship between body size and skeletal size in ape and human specimens of known body weight at death and to apply this knowledge to the hominid fossils, using a variety of statistical methods, knowledge of the associated partial skeletons of the of early hominids, formulae derived from a modern human sample, and, finally, common sense. The following modal weights for males and females emerge: Australopithecus afarensis , 45 and 29 kg; A. africanus , 41 and 30 kg; A. robustus , 40 and 32 kg; A. boisei , 49 and 34 kg; H. habilis , 52 and 32 kg. The best known African early H. erectus were much larger with weights ranging from 55 kg on up. These estimates imply that (1) in the earliest hominid species and the “robust” australopithecines body sizes remained small relative to modern standards, but between 2.0 and 1.7 m.y.a. there was a rapid increase to essentially modern body size with the appearance of Homo erectus ; (2) the earliest species had a degree of body size sexual dimorphism well above that seen in modern humans but below that seen in modern gorillas and orangs which implies (along with other evidence) a social organization characterized by kin‐related, multi‐male groups with females who were not kin‐related; (3) relative brain sizes increased through time; (4) there were two divergent trends in relative cheek‐tooth size—a steady increase through time from A. afarensis to A. africanus to the “robust” australopithecines, and a decrease beginning with H. habilis to H. erectus to H. sapiens .