
Sub‐synchronous resonance mitigation via distributed power flow controller
Author(s) -
Khazaie Javad,
Mokhtari Maghsood,
Badkubi Salman,
Khalilian Mansour,
Nazarpour Daryoush
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international transactions on electrical energy systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 42
ISSN - 2050-7038
DOI - 10.1002/etep.1617
Subject(s) - distributed power , controller (irrigation) , electric power system , engineering , electric power transmission , converters , unified power flow controller , transmission line , control theory (sociology) , power electronics , control engineering , computer science , power (physics) , power flow , electrical engineering , voltage , control (management) , agronomy , physics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , biology
SUMMARY Sub‐synchronous resonance (SSR) is a frequent adverse phenomenon in series‐compensated lines, threatening either or both mechanical facilities and power system stability. It is widely accepted that flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) can provide an effective solution to relieve the SSR. On the other hand, the advent of distributed FACTS (D‐FACTS) technology has led to more economical deployment of the flexible devices in the power system control. This article focuses on verifying the capability of the distributed power flow controller (DPFC) to alleviate the SSR. As a member of the D‐FACTS family, the DPFC operates in the same way as the unified power flow controller (UPFC). Compared with UPFC, the DPFC has some advantages like higher control capability, lower price, and more reliability. The DPFC impact on SSR mitigation is interrogated in various case studies, namely, with the SSR damping (SSRD) controller on the series converter, with SSRD controller on the shunt converter and with both simultaneously operating. The best case for SSR mitigation is achieved when the DPFC is supplied with two SSRD controllers concurrently. Simulations are carried out with Power Systems Computer Aided Design/ Electromagnetic Transients including DC (PSCAD/EMTDC) on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) first SSR benchmark model aggregated with DPFC on the transmission line. Furthermore, a comparison between the SSRD controller on DPFC converters and the supplementary excitation damping controller or the conventional power system stabilizer is also carried out. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.