Premium
Simultaneous experimental study of direct and direct plus trophic contamination of the crayfish astacus astacus by inorganic mercury and methylmercury
Author(s) -
Simon Olivier,
Boudou Alain
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620200609
Subject(s) - trophic level , hepatopancreas , astacus , methylmercury , crayfish , bioaccumulation , mercury (programming language) , environmental chemistry , chemistry , carapace , portunus trituberculatus , biology , crustacean , ecology , computer science , programming language
An experimental study was carried out to investigate direct and direct plus trophic contamination routes of the crayfish Astacus astacus by inorganic mercury (Hg(II)) or methylmercury (MeHg). Direct exposure was based on low contamination conditions, 300 and 30 ng/L in the dissolved phase, respectively, during 30 d at 20°C. Trophic exposure was based on daily consumption of the Asiatic clam Corbicula fluminea , previously contaminated during 40 d with similar exposure conditions. The Hg concentrations in the bivalves were very similar: 1,451 ± 287 ng/g for Hg(II) and 1,346 ± 143 ng/g for MeHg. In the crustaceans, Hg bioaccumulation was analyzed at the whole‐organism level and in eight organs (gills, stomach, intestine, hepatopancreas, tail muscle, green gland, carapace, and hemolymph), after 15 and 30 d of exposure. Analysis of the results showed marked differences between Hg(II) and MeHg accumulation in favor of MeHg: for the direct route, the ratio between metal concentrations was close to 8; for the trophic route, no significant increase in Hg accumulation was observed for Hg(II) even when the ratio between Hg concentration in the direct plus trophic contamination route and Hg concentration in the direct contamination route was 1.6 for MeHg, with an estimated trophic transfer rate close to 20%. Mercury organotropism was also specifically connected to the exposure conditions, especially at the biological barrier level according to the route of exposure: gills and carapace for the direct route and digestive tract including hepatopancreas for the trophic route.