Premium
Tolerance of freshwater test organisms to formulated sediments for use as control materials in whole‐sediment toxicity tests
Author(s) -
Kemble Nile E.,
Dwyer F. James,
Ingersoll Christopher G.,
Dawson Timothy D.,
NorbergKing Teresa J.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620180218
Subject(s) - hyalella azteca , sediment , chironomus riparius , environmental chemistry , environmental science , sediment control , ecotoxicology , ecology , amphipoda , biology , chemistry , chironomidae , paleontology , crustacean , larva
Abstract A method is described for preparing formulated sediments for use intoxicity testing. Ingredients used to prepare formulated sediments included commercially available silt, clay, sand, humic acid, dolomite, and α‐cellulose (as a source of organic carbon). α‐Cellulose was selected as the source of organic carbon because it is commercially available, consistent from batch to batch, and low in contaminant concentrations. The tolerance of freshwater test organisms to formulated sediments for use as control materials in whole‐sediment toxicity testing was evaluated. Sediment exposures were conducted for 10 d with the amphipod Hyalella azteca , the midges Chironomus riparius and C. tentans , and the oligochaete Lumbriculus variegatus and for 28 d with H. azteca . Responses of organisms in formulated sediments was compared with a field‐collected control sediment that has routinely been used to determine test acceptability. Tolerance of organisms to formulated sediments was evaluated by determining responses to varying levels of α‐cellulose, to varying levels of grain size, to evaluation of different food types, or to evaluation of different sources of overlying water. In the 10‐d exposures, survival of organisms exposed to the formulated sediments routinely met or exceeded the responses of test organisms exposed to the control sediment and routinely met test acceptability criteria required in standard methods. Growth of amphipods and oligochaetes in 10‐d exposures with formulated sediment was often less than growth of organisms in the field‐collected control sediment. Additional research is needed, using the method employed to prepare formulated sediment, to determine if conditioning formulated sediments before starting 10‐d tests would improve the growth of amphipods. In the 28‐d exposures, survival of H. azteca was low when reconstituted water was used as the source of overlying water. However, when well water was used as the source of overlying water in 28‐d exposures, consistent responses of amphipods were observed in both formulated and control sediments.