Premium
Sediment toxicity and benthic communities in mildly contaminated mudflats
Author(s) -
Nipper Marion G.,
Roper David S.,
Williams Erica K.,
Martin Michael L.,
Van Dam Laurence F.,
Mills Geoffrey N.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620170322
Subject(s) - benthic zone , sediment , environmental chemistry , contamination , environmental science , toxicity , pollution , estuary , water quality , intertidal zone , water pollution , ecology , biology , chemistry , paleontology , organic chemistry
Abstract Sediment physicochemical characteristics, benthic community structure, and toxicity were measured at reference and contaminated intertidal mudflats around the North Island of New Zealand. Chronic whole‐sediment toxicity tests were conducted with the estuarine amphipod Chaetocorophium lucasi and the marine bivalve Macomona liliana , and pore‐water toxicity tests were conducted with embryos of the echinoid Fellaster zelandiae. Although concentrations of organic chemicals and heavy metals were up to several orders of magnitude higher at the sites considered to be contaminated, levels of contamination were relatively low compared to internationally based sediment quality guidelines. Although no pronounced difference was found in benthic community structure between reference and contaminated sites, multivariate analysis indicated that natural sediment characteristics (total organic carbon, acid‐volatile sulfide, ammonium) and factors related to contamination (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, sediment toxicity) may have been affecting community structure. Although benthic effects caused by present levels of contamination are not yet dramatic, subtle changes in community structure related to pollution may be occurring. The two whole‐sediment and the pore‐water toxicity tests presented different response patterns. Growth of C. lucasi and M. liliana was a less sensitive endpoint than survival. None of the three toxicity tests responded more strongly to the contaminated than to the reference sites, that is, neither natural‐sediment and pore‐water characteristics nor unmeasured contaminants affected the test organisms. It is possible that sediment collection and handling may have induced chemical changes, confounding interpretation of toxicity tests.